Antigua News is facing a US$27 million lawsuit in a cross-border defamation battle.

Businessman Boris Latour has launched both criminal and civil proceedings. He filed actions in Switzerland and in Antigua and Barbuda. The claims stem from articles published in February 2025 and January 2026.

First, Latour sent formal pre-action notices. He served them on February 10 and February 16, 2026. In those letters, he demanded urgent corrections.

Moreover, he included certified court documents. Those papers, he said, confirm no criminal proceedings exist against him in France. In addition, he provided detailed factual clarifications. He addressed each major allegation point by point.

Furthermore, the notices stressed a key legal principle. Under defamation law, the burden of proof rests on the publisher making criminal claims. Therefore, he demanded a full withdrawal of the allegations.

He also called for the preservation of all relevant evidence. That included editorial records and internal communications.

However, the publisher declined to remove the content. It also left the final formal notice unanswered. As a result, Latour moved forward with legal action.

Now, the matter sits before the competent courts in both jurisdictions. The case could test cross-border media liability rules.

Specifically, judges will examine the origin of the allegations. They will also review the factual basis behind the claims. In addition, the courts will assess the editorial process before publication.

The inquiry will go further. It will look at communications and coordination prior to release. It will also review any financial or promotional arrangements tied to the stories.

Notably, the courts plan to examine possible AI-related or digital manipulation of media. They will also study whether paid promotion boosted the reach of the content.

Finally, judges will consider whether structural conflicts of interest exist within the publishing entity.

Overall, the lawsuit raises serious questions about media accountability. At the same time, it highlights the growing complexity of cross-border defamation disputes.

As proceedings unfold, both media outlets and legal observers will watch closely.